4.3 Article

Comparison of urinary thallium levels in non-occupationally exposed people and workers

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00420-013-0859-8

Keywords

Thallium; Urine; Occupational exposure; Biological monitoring; Creatinine correction; ICP-MS

Funding

  1. Health and Safety Laboratory Investment Research Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To determine a reference background urinary thallium level; to compare urinary thallium data from workers to this background level; to investigate factors affecting these levels and whether creatinine correction is appropriate. Urine samples from non-occupationally exposed people (n = 273, from 113 individuals) and workers (n = 896, from 447 individuals) were analysed for thallium by ICP-MS. A reference background level was calculated, defined as the 95th percentile value of a non-occupationally exposed population. Worker data were divided into two subsets: thallium workers (those who work directly with thallium or its compounds) and general workers; and compared to the background level. Bayesian linear mixed effects modelling was used to investigate factors affecting urinary thallium concentration and the efficacy of creatinine correction for the determination of urinary thallium. The reference background urinary thallium level is 0.27 mu mol/mol creatinine (creatinine-corrected) or 0.40 mu g/l (uncorrected). Median values were 0.11 mu mol/mol creatinine or 0.17 mu g/l for non-occupationally exposed people, 0.12 mu mol/mol creatinine or 0.20 mu g/l for general workers and 0.19 mu mol/mol creatinine or 0.41 mu g/l for thallium workers. Variation was lower in creatinine-corrected models. Nine per cent of samples from general workers and 39 % of samples from thallium workers exceeded the creatinine-corrected background level. By 2010, 90 % of all workers had urinary thallium levels below the 95th percentile reference background level. Urinary thallium concentrations were higher in thallium workers than non-occupationally exposed people and general workers. Creatinine correction is appropriate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available