4.3 Article

Sexually dimorphic stress and pro-inflammatory cytokine responses to an intravenous corticotropin-releasing hormone challenge of Brahman cattle following transportation

Journal

INNATE IMMUNITY
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 378-387

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1753425912462752

Keywords

Acute; cattle; cortisol; CRH; innate immunity; sexual dimorphism

Funding

  1. Texas A&M AgriLife Research, USDA-NRI-CSREES [2005-01671]
  2. USDA [SG 2006-34564-170]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was designed to characterize potential sexually dimorphic stress and immunological responses following a corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) challenge in beef cattle. Six female (heifers) and six male (bulls) Brahman calves (264 +/- 12d of age) were administered CRH intravenously (0.5 mu g of CRH/kg body mass) after which serum concentrations of cortisol increased from 0.5h to 4h. From 1h to 4h after CRH administration, serum cortisol concentrations were greater in heifers than in bulls. In all cattle, increased serum concentrations of TNF-, IL-6 and IFN- were observed from 2.5h to 3h after CRH, with greater concentrations of IFN- and IL-6 in heifers than bulls. Heifer total leukocyte counts decreased 1h after CRH administration, while bull leukocyte counts and percent neutrophils decreased 2h after CRH administration. Heifers had greater rectal temperatures than bulls, yet rectal temperatures did not change following administration of CRH. There was no effect of CRH administration on heart rate. However, bulls tended to have increased heart rate 2h after CRH administration than before CRH. Heifer heart rate was greater than bulls throughout the study. These data demonstrate that acute CRH administration can elicit a pro-inflammatory response, and cattle exhibit a sexually dimorphic pro-inflammatory cytokine and cortisol response to acute CRH administration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available