4.7 Article

Cascaded classification of high resolution remote sensing images using multiple contexts

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 221, Issue -, Pages 84-97

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.09.024

Keywords

Context-enabled classification; Object based image analysis; Multiple contexts integration; High resolution remote sensing images

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a novel cascaded classification approach by exploiting various contexts on different levels for high resolution remote sensing (HRRS) images. The contexts mentioned in our article are defined according to objects from a set of regions resulting from segmentation. The cascaded procedure comprises three stages: (1) initializing the classification using the object's inner context (i.e., the gray constraints of different pixels in an object), (2) correcting the classification using the object's neighbor context (i.e., the characteristic constraints of different objects adjacent to the concerned object), and (3) refining classification using the object's scene context (i.e., the distribution constraint of different objects' labels and their feature vectors in the whole scene). The proposed algorithm has the following distinctions. First, it uses an object's neighbor context to bridge the gap between its inner context and its scene context because the latter two types of contexts have inevitable drawbacks when being used for classification alone. Second, it carries on a cascaded classification procedure in which the previous stage provides a better initial classification for the following stage, and the result is gradually refined by integrating different contexts. The effectiveness and practicability of the proposed algorithm is demonstrated through a set of completely experimental results and substantiated using quantitative criteria. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available