4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Hopping mobility concept for search and rescue robots

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/01439910810868561

Keywords

search and rescue; robotics; microsensors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - This paper seeks to present recent work demonstrating the feasibility of Microbots' mobility in rough terrain. Microbots are a new search and rescue concept based on the deployment of teams of small spherical mobile robots. In this concept, hundreds to thousands of cm-scale, sub-kilogram Microbots are released over a search site such as collapsed building rubble or caves. Microbots use hopping, bouncing, and rolling to infiltrate subterranean spaces in search of possible survivors. Design/methodology/approach - The feasibility of the Microbot mobility concept is evaluated through laboratory prototypes and mobility simulations. Findings - Experimental studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using dielectric elastomer actuators (DEAs) to generate autonomous hops. High-efficiency hydrogen fuel cells were shown to be able to power IDEAs. Simulation results show that Microbots of proper diameter and hop height can successfully traverse very rough terrains. Research limitations/implications - The implication of this research is that small hopping robots are appropriate for certain search and rescue missions. The limitation of the research to date is that issues of control, path planning, and communication have not yet been addressed. Practical implications - Key technologies of the Microbot mobility that use high-energy-density micro fuel cells combined with low cost and lightweight DEAs, are feasible. These technologies have the potential to make a significant impact on the search and rescue robots. Originality/value - These results suggest that a team of Microbots-based DEAs and micro fuel cells can be a useful and effective tool for search and rescue operations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available