4.6 Article

Susceptibility of green and conventional building materials to microbial growth

Journal

INDOOR AIR
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 273-284

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ina.12140

Keywords

N-acetylhexosaminidase; Green building materials; Colony-forming units; Normalized concentration; Dust; Enzyme activity

Funding

  1. Finnish Distinguished Professor (FiDiPro) program for the Development of Bioaerosol Testing Facilities (BiTeFa) through TEKES [1391/31/2011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Green building materials are becoming more popular. However, little is known about their ability to support or limit microbial growth. The growth of fungi was evaluated on five building materials. Two green, two conventional building materials and wood as a positive control were selected. The materials were inoculated with Aspergillus versicolor, Cladosporium cladosporioides and Penicillium brevicompactum, in the absence and presence of house dust. Microbial growth was assessed at four different time points by cultivation and determining fungal biomass using the N-acetylhexosaminidase (NAHA) enzyme assay. No clear differences were seen between green and conventional building materials in their susceptibility to support microbial growth. The presence of dust, an external source of nutrients, promoted growth of all the fungal species similarly on green and conventional materials. The results also showed a correlation coefficient ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 between NAHA activity and culturable counts. The results suggest that the growth of microbes on a material surface depends on the availability of organic matter rather than the classification of the material as green or conventional. NAHA activity and culturability correlated well indicating that the two methods used in the experiments gave similar trends for the growth of fungi on material surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available