4.5 Article

Thrombolysis ImPlementation in Stroke (TIPS): evaluating the effectiveness of a strategy to increase the adoption of best evidence practice - protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial in acute stroke care

Journal

IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-38

Keywords

Collaborative intervention; Thrombolysis; Acute stroke; Evidence-based practice; Quality improvement; Cluster randomised controlled trial; Multidisciplinary approach

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [ID569328]
  2. TRIP fellowship
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim
  4. ACI Stroke Care Network/Stroke Services NSW
  5. Victorian Stroke Clinical Network
  6. National Stroke Foundation (NSF)
  7. NSW Cardiovascular Research Network-National Heart Foundation
  8. Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI)
  9. University of Newcastle (UoN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability internationally. One of the three effective interventions in the acute phase of stroke care is thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), if given within 4.5 hours of onset to appropriate cases of ischaemic stroke. Objectives: To test the effectiveness of a multi-component multidisciplinary collaborative approach compared to usual care as a strategy for increasing thrombolysis rates for all stroke patients at intervention hospitals, while maintaining accepted benchmarks for low rates of intracranial haemorrhage and high rates of functional outcomes for both groups at three months. Methods and design: A cluster randomised controlled trial of 20 hospitals across 3 Australian states with 2 groups: multi- component multidisciplinary collaborative intervention as the experimental group and usual care as the control group. The intervention is based on behavioural theory and analysis of the steps, roles and barriers relating to rapid assessment for thrombolysis eligibility; it involves a comprehensive range of strategies addressing individual-level and system-level change at each site. The primary outcome is the difference in tPA rates between the two groups post-intervention. The secondary outcome is the proportion of tPA treated patients in both groups with good functional outcomes (modified Rankin Score (mRS <2) and the proportion with intracranial haemorrhage (mRS >= 2), compared to international benchmarks. Discussion: TIPS will trial a comprehensive, multi-component and multidisciplinary collaborative approach to improving thrombolysis rates at multiple sites. The trial has the potential to identify methods for optimal care which can be implemented for stroke patients during the acute phase. Study findings will include barriers and solutions to effective thrombolysis implementation and trial outcomes will be published whether significant or not.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available