4.6 Article

Optimization of micro single dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator models based on experimental velocity and body force fields

Journal

ACTA ASTRONAUTICA
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages 318-332

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.07.015

Keywords

Micro SDBD; DBD modeling; Plasma-induced force; Wall jet; DBD microthruster

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, the Micro Single Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuator has become attractive for application in aeronautics and micropopulsion thrusters. The present work carried out a preliminary characterization of such device, acting on initially quiescent air by experimental and numerical approaches. Sinusoidal voltage excitation with amplitude up to 7 kV and frequency up to 2.5 kHz was applied. The induced flow was investigated by particle image velocimetry and the measured velocity fields were used to estimate experimentally the time-averaged induced body force distributions by a differential method. Plasma induced forces were modeled by following three different approaches, later implemented as a source term in the Navier-Stokes equations for the fluid flow simulations. Potentialities, advantages and disadvantages of the considered force modeling methods were investigated. Quantitative comparison of the experimental and numerical induced force, as well as of the velocity fields, allowed establishing which model best predicted the actuator effects. The algebraic Dual Potential Model provided a good agreement between experimental and simulated results, in terms of flow velocities and thickness of the induced wall-jet. The downstream decay of the wall-jet velocity, experimentally observed, was also successfully predicted. A maximum induced velocity of approximate to 2 m/s was obtained and a jet thickness of approximate to 3 mm. (C) 2015 IAA. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available