4.2 Article

Polymorphism of costimulatory molecules (CTLA4, ICOS, PD.1 and CD28) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Iranian patients

Journal

IMMUNOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 391-404

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/08820139.2013.879594

Keywords

CD28; CTLA4; gene polymorphism; Graft Versus Host Disease; inducible costimulator; program cell death 1; stem cell transplantation

Categories

Funding

  1. Transplant Research Center of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Costimulatory molecules are important factors determining the outcome of bone marrow transplant. Because the host ability in costimulatory molecule function may be affected by gene polymorphisms, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of CTLA4, ICOS, PD.1 and CD28 gene polymorphisms in outcome of bone marrow transplant patients. A total of 72 recipients were included in this study. CTLA4 (-1722, -1661, -318, + 49), ICOS (+ 1720), CD28 (+ 17) and PD.1 (PD. 1.3, PD. 1.9) gene polymorphisms were evaluated by PCR-RFLP. The results showed that no differences in the distribution of all mentioned costimulatory molecules genotypes and alleles were observed in the Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) group compared to the non-GVHD group. After gender classification, there is a significant association between GA genotype (CTLA4-1661) in male group with GVHD than without GVHD (p = 0.03). Also, in this study we found significant associations between CC genotype and C allele of PD. 1.9, and TT genotype and T allele of CD28 that had more frequency in grades 2-4 (p = 0.04. p = 0.02, p = 0.01, p = 0.003, respectively). Results indicate that the CC genotype and C allele of PD. 1.9 and TT genotype and the T allele of CD28 are genetic risk factors for development of a severe grade of GVHD. This subject needs to be studied in different population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available