4.0 Article

Production system design for quality robustness

Journal

IIE TRANSACTIONS
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 162-176

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07408170601013661

Keywords

quality robustness; first time quality; production system design; repair and rework; automotive paint shops

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In automotive assembly plants, vehicles with defects are either repaired ( e. g., components are exchanged, scratches are polished, etc.) or reworked ( e. g., the whole vehicle is repainted) to maintain high product quality. The performance of vehicle quality is typically characterized in terms of the. first time quality and also the quality buy rate. First time quality is defined as the good job ratio of all. first time processing jobs, while the quality buy rate is the good job ratio of all processed jobs, including the first time jobs and reworked jobs. In this paper, we study a repair and rework system at an automotive paint shop with random first time quality. Specifically, we show that paint quality, in terms of quality buy rate, can be described by a function of repair capacity and first time quality. Increasing the repair capacity can improve the quality buy rate and reduce unnecessary repaints. Variations in. first time quality may lead to a reduction in the quality buy rate and an increase in unnecessary repaints, and consequently, a substantial waste of production capacity and materials. In addition, we observe that the average quality buy rate depends primarily on the mean and coefficient of variation of the first time quality rather than its complete distribution. Based on these results, we introduce the notion of quality robustness and show that the design of a production system should accommodate randomness in. first time quality to achieve a robust quality buy rate. Finally, a case study on a repair and rework system redesign to improve paint quality is presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available