4.0 Article

Multi-state k-out-of-n systems and their performance evaluation

Journal

IIE TRANSACTIONS
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 32-44

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07408170802322655

Keywords

Multi-state system; k-out-of-n; reliability evaluation; performance levels; failure modes

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Alberta Ingenuity Fund
  3. Killam Trusts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The k-out-of-n system structure is a very popular type of redundancy in fault-tolerant systems, with wide applications in both industrial and military systems. In this paper, the modeling, application and reliability evaluation of k-out-of-n systems are studied for the case where the components and the system have multiple performance levels. A multi-state k-out-of-n system model is proposed that allows different requirements on the number of components for different state levels, and, very importantly, more practical engineering systems can fit into this model. The multiple states in the model can be interpreted in two ways: (i) multiple levels of capacity; and (ii) multiple failure modes. Application examples of the proposed multi-state k-out-of-n system model are given under each of the interpretations. An approach is presented for efficient reliability evaluation of multi-state k-out-of-n systems with identically and independently distributed components. A recursive algorithm is proposed for reliability evaluation of multi-state k-out-of-n systems with independent components. Efficiency investigations show that both of the reliability evaluation approaches are efficient. The multi-state k-out-of-n system model with a constant k value, which is a special case of the general multi-state k-out-of-n system model, has been studied for a long time, but only on the theoretical stage. A practical application of this model is presented in this paper as well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available