4.6 Article

Oxygen partial pressure and thermal annealing dependent properties of RF magnetron sputtered TiO2-x films

Journal

MATERIALS SCIENCE IN SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSING
Volume 32, Issue -, Pages 107-116

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2014.12.080

Keywords

Titanium dioxide; Sputtering; Oxygen partial pressure; Deposition rate; Chemical states; Resistivity

Funding

  1. Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Department of Electrical Engineering under Brain Korea 21 plus programme [2014-00630]
  2. Center for Integrated Smart Sensors through the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Global Frontier Project, South Korea [CISS-2011-0031848]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TiO2-x thin films were deposited on unheated SiO2/Si substrates by RF reactive magnetron sputtering at different oxygen partial pressures (pO(2)). The structural properties of the films were characterized by Grazing incident X-ray diffraction (GIXRD), Raman spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The FE-SEM images exhibited dense and smooth film surfaces likely due to the limited ability of adatoms to migrate on the substrate at room temperature. The indirect and direct optical band gaps of TiO2-x films shift towards higher photon energy with increasing pO(2). In order to optimize the thermal stability of structural and electrical properties, the as-deposited films were annealed at 300 degrees C in air atmosphere. But, no significant variations were observed in structural and morphological properties compared to as-deposited films, due to the low surface mobility and distant growth temperature of Titania crystallization. However, sizeable distinction in electrical resistivity behaviour was observed in annealed TiO2-x films. Finally, it was found that a higher resistivity causes a higher activation energy and then higher TCR value. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available