4.7 Article

Recipe for Uncovering Predictive Genes Using Support Vector Machines Based on Model Population Analysis

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2011.36

Keywords

Informative gene selection; cancer classification; support vector machines; margin; model population analysis

Funding

  1. National Nature Foundation Committee of P.R. China [20875104, 10771217]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2007DFA40680]
  3. Graduate degree thesis Innovation Foundation of Central South University [CX2010B057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selecting a small number of informative genes for microarray-based tumor classification is central to cancer prediction and treatment. Based on model population analysis, here we present a new approach, called Margin Influence Analysis (MIA), designed to work with support vector machines (SVM) for selecting informative genes. The rationale for performing margin influence analysis lies in the fact that the margin of support vector machines is an important factor which underlies the generalization performance of SVM models. Briefly, MIA could reveal genes which have statistically significant influence on the margin by using Mann-Whitney U test. The reason for using the Mann-Whitney U test rather than two-sample t test is that Mann-Whitney U test is a nonparametric test method without any distribution-related assumptions and is also a robust method. Using two publicly available cancerous microarray data sets, it is demonstrated that MIA could typically select a small number of margin-influencing genes and further achieves comparable classification accuracy compared to those reported in the literature. The distinguished features and outstanding performance may make MIA a good alternative for gene selection of high dimensional microarray data. (The source code in MATLAB with GNU General Public License Version 2.0 is freely available at http://code.google.com/p/mia2009/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available