4.7 Article

Magnetic Resonance Poroelastography: An Algorithm for Estimating the Mechanical Properties of Fluid-Saturated Soft Tissues

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 746-755

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2035309

Keywords

Finite element method; inverse problems; magnetic resonance elastography (MRE); poroelasticity

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA080139-09, P01 CA080139] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB004632-04, R01 EB004632] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic resonance poroelastography (MRPE) is introduced as an alternative to single-phase model-based elastographic reconstruction methods. A 3-D finite element poroelastic inversion algorithm was developed to recover the mechanical properties of fluid-saturated tissues. The performance of this algorithm was assessed through a variety of numerical experiments, using synthetic data to probe its stability and sensitivity to the relevant model parameters. Preliminary results suggest the algorithm is robust in the presence of noise and capable of producing accurate assessments of the underlying mechanical properties in simulated phantoms. Furthermore, a 3-D time-harmonic motion field was recorded for a poroelastic phantom containing a single cylindrical inclusion and used to assess the feasibility of MRPE image reconstruction from experimental data. The elastograms obtained from the proposed poroelastic algorithm demonstrate significant improvement over linearly elastic MRE images generated using the same data. In addition, MRPE offers the opportunity to estimate the time-harmonic pressure field resulting from tissue excitation, highlighting the potential for its application in the diagnosis and monitoring of disease processes associated with changes in interstitial pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available