4.4 Article

Finite-Element Neural Network-Based Solving 3-D Differential Equations in MFL

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
Volume 48, Issue 12, Pages 4747-4756

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2012.2207732

Keywords

Conjugate gradient (CG) algorithm; finite-element method (FEM); finite-element neural network (FENN); forward model; inverse problem; magnetic flux leakage (MFL) testing

Funding

  1. Natural Science Fund of Hebei Province, P. R. China [E2008001258]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The solution of a differential equation contains the forward model and the inverse problem. The finite element method (FEM) and the iterative approach based on FEM are extensively used to solve varied differential equations. Although FEM could obtain an accurate solution, the shortcoming of the approach is the high computational costs. This paper proposes an improved finite-element neural network (FENN) embedding a FEM in a neural network structure for solving the forward model while a conjugate gradient (CG) method is employed as the learning algorithm. Taking the 3-D magnetic field analysis in magnetic flux leakage (MFL) testing as an example, the comparison between CG algorithm and the gradient descent (GD) algorithm is presented. The vector plot of magnetic field intensity is obtained, and the vertical components of magnetic flux density are respectively analyzed. The iterative approach based on FENN and parallel radial wavelet basis function neural network is also adopted to solve the inverse problem. This approach iteratively adjusts weights of the inverse network to minimize the error between the measured and predicted values of MFL signals. The forward and inverse results indicate that FENN and the iterative approach are feasible methods with rapidness, accuracy and stability associated with 3-D different equations in MFL testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available