4.7 Article

Scalable Recommendation with Social Contextual Information

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages 2789-2802

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2014.2300487

Keywords

Social recommendation; individual preference; interpersonal influence; matrix factorization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61370022, 61003097, 60933013, 61210008]
  2. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China [2013DFG12870]
  3. National Program on Key Basic Research Project [2011CB302206]
  4. NExT Research Center - MDA, Singapore [WBS:R-252-300-001-490]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exponential growth of information generated by online social networks demands effective and scalable recommender systems to give useful results. Traditional techniques become unqualified because they ignore social relation data; existing social recommendation approaches consider social network structure, but social contextual information has not been fully considered. It is significant and challenging to fuse social contextual factors which are derived from users' motivation of social behaviors into social recommendation. In this paper, we investigate the social recommendation problem on the basis of psychology and sociology studies, which exhibit two important factors: individual preference and interpersonal influence. We first present the particular importance of these two factors in online behavior prediction. Then we propose a novel probabilistic matrix factorization method to fuse them in latent space. We further provide a scalable algorithm which can incrementally process the large scale data. We conduct experiments on both Facebook style bidirectional and Twitter style unidirectional social network data sets. The empirical results and analysis on these two large data sets demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms the existing approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available