4.7 Article

Polarimetric PALSAR Calibration

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages 3951-3959

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2032176

Keywords

Antenna gain; calibration; polarimetric radar; synthetic aperture radar (SAR)

Funding

  1. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) Calibration Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polarimetric Phased-Array-type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR) system parameters are assessed using data sets collected over several calibration sites. The data collected over the Amazonian rain forest help validate the hypothesis that Faraday rotation is zero near the equator. The analysis of the Amazonian forest data and the response of the corner reflectors deployed there during the PALSAR acquisitions lead to the conclusion that the antenna is highly isolated (better than -35 dB). These results are confirmed using the data collected over calibration sites located in Sweden and Canada. The 5-m-height corner reflector deployed at the Remningstorp (Sweden) calibration site by Chalmers University of Technology provides accurate measurement of antenna parameters and detection of a (2 degrees-3 degrees) Faraday rotation during day-time acquisitions, whereas no Faraday rotation was noted during night-time acquisitions. Small Faraday rotation angles (2 degrees-3 degrees) have been measured using acquisitions over the DLR Oberpfaffenhofen and the Ottawa calibration sites. The presence of small but still significant Faraday rotation (2 degrees-3 degrees) induces a corner reflector return at the cross-polarization HV and VH that should not be interpreted as the actual antenna crosstalk. These results show that the PALSAR antenna is highly isolated (better than -35 dB), and diagonal antenna distortion matrices (with zero crosstalk terms) can be used for accurate calibration of PALSAR polarimetric data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available