Journal
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 115-128Publisher
IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2008.927784
Keywords
Advanced manufacturing technology (AMT); complementarity; supermodularity
Categories
Funding
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Ask authors/readers for more resources
During the past decade, manufacturers have invested heavily in the use of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMTS). The results of these investments have been mixed, as some organizations have seen significant returns while others have experienced major problems in implementation. As yet, the returns and complementarities between AMT have not been determined. Using complementarity assumptions developed by Milgrom and Roberts [P Milgrom and J. Roberts, Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities, Econometrica, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1255-1277, 1990.], [P Milgrom and J. Roberts, Complementarities and fit - strategy, structure, and organizational-change in manufacturing, J. Accounting Economics, vol. 19, no. 2-3, pp. 179-208, 1995], combined with the Survey of Advanced Technology in Canadian Manufacturing (a comprehensive AMT survey), a model of manufacturing plant productivity was developed. Constrained regression analysis reveals that the effective use of AMT depends on the types of AMT used in combination and that analysis done with a high level of aggregation of either size classes or industries will result in ambiguous conclusions. Insight into the impact of complementarities on optimal AMT adoption strategies is provided through solution lattices for medium plants and the vehicle industry.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available