4.5 Article

Error Recovery in Cyberphysical Digital Microfluidic Biochips

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCAD.2012.2211104

Keywords

Biochips; cyberphysical systems; microfluidics

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [CCF-0914895, CNS-1135853]
  2. Taiwan National Science Council (NSC) [NSC 101-2220-E-006-016, 101-2628-E-006-018-MY3]
  3. Ministry of Education, Taiwan, under the NCKU Aim for the Top University Project Promoting Academic Excellence and Developing World Class Research Centers
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  5. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1135853] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations
  7. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0914895] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Droplet-based digital microfluidics technology has now come of age, and software-controlled biochips for healthcare applications are starting to emerge. However, today's digital microfluidic biochips suffer from the drawback that there is no feedback to the control software from the underlying hardware platform. Due to the lack of precision inherent in biochemical experiments, errors are likely during droplet manipulation; error recovery based on the repetition of experiments leads to wastage of expensive reagents and hard-to-prepare samples. By exploiting recent advances in the integration of optical detectors (sensors) into a digital microfluidics biochip, we present a physical-aware system reconfiguration technique that uses sensor data at intermediate checkpoints to dynamically reconfigure the biochip. A cyberphysical resynthesis technique is used to recompute electrode-actuation sequences, thereby deriving new schedules, module placement, and droplet routing pathways, with minimum impact on the time-to-response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available