4.6 Article

Evaluation and Analysis of Logistic Network Resilience With Application to Aircraft Servicing

Journal

IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 166-173

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2009.2017395

Keywords

Aircraft service; logistics; performance evaluation; resilience engineering; resource optimization; risk management; supply chain

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60821063, 70771021]
  2. National Science and Technology Support Plan [2006BAH02A09]
  3. Hong Kong Polytechnic University [G-YF56]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To analyze the resilience of logistic networks, it is proposed to use a quantificational resilience evaluation approach. Firstly, the node resilience in a network is evaluated by its redundant resources, distributed suppliers and reachable deliveries. Then, an index of the total resilience of logistic network is calculated with the weighted sum of the node resilience. Based on the evaluation approach of resilience, the reasonable structure of the logistic networks is analyzed. A model is then studied to optimize the allocation of resources with connections, distribution centers or warehouses. Our approach has been used to study the resilience of logistic networks for aircraft maintenance and service and to guarantee the security and service quality of aeronautical systems. To monitor the operation of the logistic networks and enhance resilience, the architecture of a synthesized aircraft maintenance information management system and service logistic network is designed and being developed, which is called Resilience Information Management System for Aircraft Service (RIMAS). The research results have been provided to the decision makers of the aviation management sector in the Chu Chiang Delta of China. Good comments have been achieved, which shows that the approach has potential for application in practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available