4.5 Article

Treatment of type 2 hepatorenal syndrome in patients awaiting transplantation: Effects on kidney function and transplantation outcomes

Journal

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages 1347-1354

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lt.24210

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria [FIS PI080126, FIS 2012/PI12/00330]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  3. European Association for the Study of the Liver (Sheila Sherlock Entry-Level fellowship)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is little information on the effects of treatment with vasoconstrictors plus albumin in patients with type 2 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), particularly those awaiting liver transplantation (LT). This study reports the effects of treatment of type 2 HRS in patients on the waiting list for LT. We included 56 patients with type 2 HRS who were awaiting LT. Out of these 56 patients, 31 were treated with terlipressin and albumin. Nineteen (61%) of these 31 patients had response to therapy, and 11 of them relapsed after treatment withdrawal. There were no differences in mortality on the waiting list between responders and nonresponders. Among the 46 (82%) patients who underwent transplantation, 15 underwent transplantation with reversal of type 2 HRS, whereas the remaining 31 underwent transplantation with type 2 HRS. There were no significant differences in serum creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate between the 2 cohorts of patients at 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation. There were no significant differences regarding development of acute kidney injury, need for renal replacement therapy, frequency of chronic kidney disease 1 year after transplant, length of hospitalization, and survival. In conclusion, treatment of patients with type 2 HRS with terlipressin and albumin does not appear to have beneficial effects either in pretransplantation or in posttransplantation outcomes. Liver Transpl 21:1347-1354, 2015. (c) 2015 AASLD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available