4.1 Article

Effect of waterfalls on fluvial fish distribution and landlocked Rhinogobius brunneus populations on Yakushima Island, Japan

Journal

ICHTHYOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages 305-316

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10228-014-0400-4

Keywords

Biogeographic barrier; Fish migration; Mitochondrial DNA; Otolith Sr:Ca ratios; Rhinogobius sp DA

Funding

  1. Global COE Program (Center of Excellence for Asian Conservation Ecology), MEXT, Japan
  2. Cooperative Program of Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, the University of Tokyo
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [11J03315] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The distribution of fluvial fish was surveyed at 55 sites on Yakushima Island, Japan, which has precipitous mountains and waterfalls (below- or no-waterfall sites: 31; above-waterfall sites: 24). Eleven diadromous and one river resident (introduced Oncorhynchus masou masou) species were found, but absolutely no fish were detected at the 18 above-waterfall sites. Statistical analyses revealed that the presence of waterfalls (> 5 m in height) below the sites had a significant negative effect on fish distribution, suggesting that waterfalls prevent migration of diadromous fishes. We found Rhinogobius brunneus populations above high waterfalls such as Nunobiki Falls (50 m) and Ohko Falls (88 m). Otolith Sr:Ca ratios and mitochondrial DNA (cyt-b region) were examined to determine the migratory history and genetic properties of these populations; the Sr:Ca ratios indicated that the populations had a landlocked life cycle, whereas the genetic endemism/isolation of landlocked populations was unexpectedly absent. There is no clear explanation for this phenomenon, but fairly infrequent individuals of nonlandlocked type might have migrated beyond the waterfalls with their sucker-like organ and mated with landlocked populations, disrupting the genetic isolation of landlocked populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available