4.3 Article

The role of groundwater characteristics in catchment recovery from nitrate pollution

Journal

HYDROLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 560-575

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/nh.2012.020

Keywords

catchment; diffuse pollution; groundwater; nitrate; recovery; transit time

Funding

  1. Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate of the Scottish Government
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [bgs05007] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [bgs05007] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effectiveness of measures to mitigate nitrate concentrations in surface and groundwater depends not only on their suitability for reducing nitrate leaching, but also on characteristics of groundwater transport that may cause a lag in achieving recovery. The recovery of a catchment within a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone in the east of Scotland has been assessed using a combined monitoring and modelling approach. Understanding of the dominant hydrological processes was developed through a programme of monitoring of surface and groundwater bodies. Age dating of groundwater samples, using dissolved atmospheric trace gases (CFCs and SF6) underpinned the conceptualisation of groundwater transport and a lumped dispersion model was applied to the data to estimate mean solute transit times. High spatial variability in the groundwater dating made it difficult to estimate catchment means, but the range was estimated to lie between 15 and 60 years. A catchment hydrology and nitrate model was used to explore the effect of simple changes in land management on reducing nitrate concentrations, as well as associated time scales of recovery. The study has helped improve understanding of the role of groundwater in catchment recovery and given an indication of the scale of agricultural changes required to achieve different levels of pollution mitigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available