4.6 Article

Curve-Number/Green-Ampt mixed procedure for streamflow predictions in ungauged basins: Parameter sensitivity analysis

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 1265-1275

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9749

Keywords

rainfall-runoff modeling; SCS-CN method; infiltration; Green-Ampt equation; ungauged basin; sensitivity analysis

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of University [2010JHF437]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A procedure combining the Soil Conservation Service-Curve Number (SCS-CN) method and the GreenAmpt (GA) infiltration equation was recently developed to overcome some of the drawbacks of the classic SCS-CN approach when estimating the volume of surface runoff at a sub-daily time resolution. The rationale of this mixed procedure, named Curve Number for GreenAmpt (CN4GA), is to use the GA infiltration model to distribute the total volume of the net hyetograph (rainfall excess) provided by the SCS-CN method over time. The initial abstraction and the total volume of rainfall given by the SCS-CN method are used to identify the ponding time and to quantify the hydraulic conductivity parameter of the GA equation. In this paper, a sensitivity analysis of the mixed CN4GA parameters is presented with the aim to identify conditions where the mixed procedure can be effectively used within the Prediction in Ungauged Basin perspective. The effects exerted by changes in selected input parameters on the outputs are evaluated using rectangular and triangular synthetic hyetographs as well as 100 maximum annual storms selected from synthetic rainfall time series. When applied to extreme precipitation events, which are characterized by predominant peaks of rainfall, the CN4GA appears to be rather insensitive to the input hydraulic parameters of the soil, which is an interesting feature of the CN4GA approach and makes it an ideal candidate for the rainfall excess estimation at sub-daily temporal resolution at ungauged sites. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available