4.6 Article

Development of a continuous soil moisture accounting procedure for curve number methodology and its behaviour with different evapotranspiration methods

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
Volume 22, Issue 13, Pages 2114-2121

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6811

Keywords

curve number; soil moisture; SWAT; HUMUS; evapotranspiration; ET; Hargreaves; Penman-Monteith

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The curve number (CN) method is widely used for rainfall-runoff modelling in continuous hydrologic simulation models. A sound continuous soil moisture accounting procedure is necessary for models using the CN method. For shallow soils and soils with low storage, the existing methods have limitations in their ability to reproduce the observed runoff. Therefore, a simple one-parameter model based on the Soil Conservation Society CN procedure is developed for use in continuous hydrologic simulation. The sensitivity of the model parameter to runoff predictions was also analysed. In addition, the behaviour of the procedure developed and the existing continuous soil moisture accounting procedure used in hydrologic models, in combination with Penman-Monteith and Hargreaves evapotranspiration (ET) methods was also analysed. The new CN methodology, its behaviour and the sensitivity of the depletion coefficient (model parameter) were tested in four United States Geological Survey defined eight-digit watersheds in different water resources regions of the USA using the SWAT model. In addition to easy parameterization for calibration, the one-parameter model developed performed adequately in predicting runoff. When tested for shallow soils, the parameter is found to be very sensitive to surface runoff and subsurface flow and less sensitive to ET. Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available