4.6 Article

Mining lakes as groundwater-dominated hydrological systems: assessment of the water balance of Mining Lake Plessa 117 (Lusatia, Germany) using stable isotopes

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
Volume 22, Issue 23, Pages 4620-4627

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7071

Keywords

mining lake; water balance; environmental isotopes; groundwater; groundwater model

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinshcaft (DFG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, the stable isotopes delta O-18 and delta H-2 were used for assessment of the water balance in a heterogeneously structured catchment area in the Lusatian Lignite Mining District, in particular, for estimation of the annual groundwater inflow and outflow (I-GW and O-GW) of Mining Lake Plessa 117. The application of stable isotopes was possible since the water exchange in the catchment area had reached steady-state conditions after the abandonment of mining activities in 1968 and the filling of the voids and aquifers by re-rising groundwater in the years thereafter. Diverging slopes of the Evaporation Line and the Global Meteoric Water Line manifested as evaporation from the lake catchment areas. The calculated isotope water balance was compared with the commonly used surface water balance, which is unable to differentiate between I-GW and O-GW, and with a local groundwater model. The groundwater model calculated an I-GW of about 811000 m(2) yr (1) and an O-GW close to zero, whereas the isotope water balance showed fluxes of about 914 000 and 140 000 m(3) yr(-1), respectively. Considering the contribution of the groundwater inflow to the total annual input into the lake (Delta/r) and the mean residence time (tau), where the groundwater model and the isotope water balance calculated 42 and 47% for Delta/r and 4.3 and 3.9 years for tau, respectively, it was shown that both water balance calculation methods led to comparable results despite the differences in I-GW and O-GW. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available