4.5 Article

Geochemistry and isotope geochemistry of the Monfalcone thermal waters (northern Italy): inference on the deep geothermal reservoir

Journal

HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 1275-1287

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-013-1007-y

Keywords

Thermal water; Carbonate rocks; Stable isotopes; Dissolved gases; Italy

Funding

  1. Italian Department of Civil Protection - INGV

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Geochemical investigations were carried out to define the origin of the low- to moderate-temperature thermal waters feeding the Monfalcone springs in northern Italy. Chemical data indicate that waters approach the composition of seawater. Mixing processes with cold low-salinity waters are highlighted. The delta O-18 and delta D values are in the range -5.0 to -6.4 aEuro degrees, and -33 to -40 aEuro degrees, respectively, suggesting the dilution of the saline reservoir by karst-type freshwaters. A surplus of Ca2+ and Sr2+ ions with respect to a conservative mixing is ascribed to diagenetic reactions of the thermal waters with Cretaceous carbonates at depth. The measured Sr isotopic composition (Sr-87/Sr-86 ratio) ranges between 0.70803 and 0.70814; after correction for the surplus Sr, a Sr-87/Sr-86 ratio indicating Miocene paleo-seawater is obtained. The dissolved gases indicate long-lasting gas-water interactions with a deep-originated gas phase of crustal origin, dominated by CO2 and marked by a water TDIC isotopic composition in the range -5.9 to-8.8 and helium signature with 0.08 < R/Ra < 0.27, which is a typical range for the crust. A possible scenario for the Monfalcone thermal reservoir consists of Miocene marine paleowaters which infiltrated through the karstic voids formed within the prevalently Cretaceous carbonates during the upper Eocene emersion of the platform, and which were entrapped by the progressive burial by terrigenous sediments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available