Prognostic models for high and low ovarian responses in controlled ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Prognostic models for high and low ovarian responses in controlled ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 1688-1697
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Online
2014-06-06
DOI
10.1093/humrep/deu090
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Prediction of in vitro fertilization outcome at different antral follicle count thresholds in a prospective cohort of 1,012 women
- (2012) Kannamannadiar Jayaprakasan et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- Anti-Mullerian hormone: clairvoyance or crystal clear?
- (2012) S. M. Nelson et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- Anti-Mullerian hormone: poor assay reproducibility in a large cohort of subjects suggests sample instability
- (2012) O. Rustamov et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- Intra-cycle fluctuations of anti-Müllerian hormone in normal women with a regular cycle: a re-analysis
- (2012) Annelies Overbeek et al. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
- The OPTIMIST study: optimisation of cost effectiveness through individualised FSH stimulation dosages for IVF treatment. A randomised controlled trial
- (2012) Theodora C van Tilborg et al. BMC Womens Health
- Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles
- (2011) Sesh Kamal Sunkara et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- Predictive factors of ovarian response and clinical outcome after IVF/ICSI following a rFSH/GnRH antagonist protocol with or without oral contraceptive pre-treatment
- (2011) A. N. Andersen et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria
- (2011) A. P. Ferraretti et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- Conventional ovarian stimulation no longer exists: welcome to the age of individualized ovarian stimulation
- (2011) Luciano G. Nardo et al. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
- The journey from the old to the new AMH assay: how to avoid getting lost in the values
- (2011) S.M. Nelson et al. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
- AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis
- (2010) S. L. Broer et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
- Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Prevention Strategies: Individualizing Gonadotropin Dose
- (2010) François Olivennes SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
- Comparison of inter- and intra-cycle variability of anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle counts
- (2009) J. van Disseldorp et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol
- (2009) P. Devroey et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal†
- (2009) Esther Leushuis et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
- The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count
- (2008) Simone L. Broer et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- The accuracy of multivariate models predicting ovarian reserve and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis
- (2008) T.E.M. Verhagen et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
- Increased gonadotrophin stimulation does not improve IVF outcomes in patients with predicted poor ovarian reserve
- (2008) Dharmawijaya N Lekamge et al. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search