4.7 Article

Metabolomic profiling by near-infrared spectroscopy as a tool to assess embryo viability: a novel, non-invasive method for embryo selection

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 1499-1504

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den111

Keywords

non-invasive embryo selection; single-embryo transfer (SET); near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy; metabolomic profiling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The morphology of an embryo has a limited predictive value for assessing viability and ongoing pregnancy, therefore new selection tools are needed to maintain success rates with single-embryo transfer (SET). In this study, we investigated if metabolomic profiling of biomarkers of embryo culture medium by near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy has a correlation with ongoing pregnancy in SET. METHODS: A total of 333 patients scheduled for in vitro fertilization (IVF) with SET were included in the study. Embryos were selected for transfer by morphological criteria on Days 2 and 3 of in vitro culture, and left over culture media samples were analyzed by NIR spectroscopy. RESULTS: The NIR spectral analysis produced unique metabolomic profiles that correlated to an embryo's reproductive potential. Resulting relative viability scores between positive and negative pregnancy outcomes were statistically significant (P < 0.03). A logistic regression of factors correlated to pregnancy outcomes showed that maternal age, percent fragmentation and relative viability scores all demonstrated a relationship. The extent of the correlation was determined by accuracy computation, where the accuracy of assessing viable embryos on Day 3 by metabolomic profiling was 53.6% and the accuracy of the morphological selection was 38.5%. In addition, the positive predictive value of metabolomic profiling was 0.365 and the negative predictive value was 0.830. CONCLUSIONS: NIR metabolomic profiling of spent embryo culture media was able to distinguish viable embryos from non-viable embryos for reproduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available