4.5 Article

Mutations in NTRK3 Suggest a Novel Signaling Pathway in Human Congenital Heart Disease

Journal

HUMAN MUTATION
Volume 35, Issue 12, Pages 1459-1468

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22688

Keywords

congenital heart disease; ventricular septal defect; copy-number variants; CNV; NTRK3

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [P50-HL074731, P01-HD070454, CA094194]
  2. W.W. Smith Charitable Trust
  3. National Center for Research Resources [UL1RR024134]
  4. Audrey E Evans Endowed Chair
  5. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR000003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are the most common major birth defects and the leading cause of death from congenital malformations. The etiology remains largely unknown, though genetic variants clearly contribute. In a previous study, we identified a large copy-number variant (CNV) that deleted 46 genes in a patient with a malalignment type ventricular septal defect (VSD). The CNV included the gene NTRK3 encoding neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor C (TrkC), which is essential for normal cardiogenesis in animal models. To evaluate the role of NTRK3 in human CHDs, we studied 467 patients with related heart defects for NTRK3 mutations. We identified four missense mutations in four patients with VSDs that were not found in ethnically matched controls and were predicted to be functionally deleterious. Functional analysis using neuroblastoma cell lines expressing mutant TrkC demonstrated that one of the mutations (c.278C>T, p.T93M) significantly reduced autophosphorylation of TrkC in response to ligand binding, subsequently decreasing phosphorylation of downstream target proteins. In addition, compared with wild type, three of the four cell lines expressing mutant TrkC showed altered cell growth in low-serum conditions without supplemental neurotrophin 3. These findings suggest a novel pathophysiological mechanism involving NTRK3 in the development of VSDs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available