4.5 Article

SgD-CNV, a database for common and rare copy number variants in three Asian populations

Journal

HUMAN MUTATION
Volume 32, Issue 12, Pages 1341-1349

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.21601

Keywords

copy number variant; rare variant; population genetics

Funding

  1. National University of Singapore
  2. National Medical Research Council, Singapore [NMRC/0796/2003, NMRC/1174/2008, NMRC/STaR/0003/2008]
  3. Biomedical Research Council [09/1/35/19/616, 05/1/36/19/413, 03/1/27/18/216, 08/1/35/19/550]
  4. National Research Foundation, Singapore [NRF-RF-2010-05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Copy number variants (CNVs) extend our understanding of the genetic diversity in humans. However, the distribution and characteristics of CNVs in Asian populations remain largely unexplored, especially for rare CNVs that have emerged as important genetic factors for complex traits. In the present study, we performed an in-depth investigation of common and rare CNVs across 8,148 individuals from the three major Asian ethnic groups: Chinese (n = 1,945), Malays (n = 2,399), and Indians (n = 2,217) in Singapore, making this investigation the most comprehensive genome-wide survey of CNVs outside the European-ancestry populations to date. We detected about 16 CNVs per individual and the ratio of loss to gain events is similar to 2:1. The majority of the CNVs are of low frequency (<10%), and 40% are rare (<1%). In each population, similar to 20% of the CNVs are not previously catalogued in the Database of Genomic Variants (DGV). Contrary to findings from European studies, the common CNVs (>5%) in our populations are not well tagged by SNPs in Illumina 1M and 610K arrays, and most disease-associated common CNVs previously reported in Caucasians are rare in our populations. We also report noticeable population differentiation in the CNV landscape of these Asian populations, with the greatest diversity seen between the Indians and the Chinese. 32:13411349, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available