4.5 Article

Oligomerization of SLC4A11 Protein and the Severity of FECD and CHED2 Corneal Dystrophies Caused by SLC4A11 Mutations

Journal

HUMAN MUTATION
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 419-428

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.21655

Keywords

congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy; CHED2; Fuchs corneal endothelial dystrophy; FECD; cornea; anion transport; misfolding; ER retention; SLC4A11

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in the SLC4A11 gene, which encodes a plasma membrane borate transporter, cause recessive congenital hereditary endothelial corneal dystrophy type 2 (CHED2), corneal dystrophy and perceptive deafness (Harboyan syndrome), and dominant late-onset Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). We analyzed missense SLC4A11 mutations identified in FECD and CHED2 patients and expressed in transfected HEK 293 cells. Chemical cross-linking and migration in nondenaturing gels showed that SLC4A11 exists as a dimer. Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation of epitope-tagged proteins revealed heteromeric interactions between wild-type (WT) and mutant SLC4A11 proteins. When expressed alone, FECD- and CHED2-causing mutant SLC4A11 proteins are primarily retained intracellularly. Co-expression with WT SLC4A11 partially rescued the cell surface trafficking of CHED2 mutants, but not FECD mutants. CHED2 alleles of SLC4A11 did not affect cell surface processing of WT SLC4A11. In contrast, FECD mutants reduced WT cell surface processing efficiency, consistent with dominant inheritance of FECD. The reduction in movement of WT protein to the cell surface caused by FECD SLC4A11 helps to explain the dominant inheritance of this disorder. Similarly, the failure of CHED2 mutant SLC4A11 to affect the processing of WT protein, explains the lack of symptoms found in CHED2 carriers and the recessive inheritance of the disorder. Hum Mutat 33:419-428, 2012. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available