Imputation across genotyping arrays for genome-wide association studies: assessment of bias and a correction strategy
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Imputation across genotyping arrays for genome-wide association studies: assessment of bias and a correction strategy
Authors
Keywords
Imputation Accuracy, African American Study, False Positive Association, Public Control, Impute SNPs
Journal
HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 132, Issue 5, Pages 509-522
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2013-01-21
DOI
10.1007/s00439-013-1266-7
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Accurate and flexible power calculations on the spot: Applications to genomic research
- (2013) David B. Allison et al. Statistics and Its Interface
- Extremely low-coverage sequencing and imputation increases power for genome-wide association studies
- (2012) Bogdan Pasaniuc et al. NATURE GENETICS
- Assessment of Genotype Imputation Performance Using 1000 Genomes in African American Studies
- (2012) Dana B. Hancock et al. PLoS One
- Inclusion of African Americans in Genetic Studies: What Is the Barrier?
- (2011) S. M. Hartz et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- An empirical evaluation of imputation accuracy for association statistics reveals increased type-I error rates in genome-wide associations
- (2011) Marcio AA Almeida et al. BMC GENETICS
- How to deal with the early GWAS data when imputing and combining different arrays is necessary
- (2011) Hae-Won Uh et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- The effect of genome-wide association scan quality control on imputation outcome for common variants
- (2011) Lorraine Southam et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- A comparison of approaches to account for uncertainty in analysis of imputed genotypes
- (2011) Jin Zheng et al. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Artifact due to differential error when cases and controls are imputed from different platforms
- (2011) Jennifer A. Sinnott et al. HUMAN GENETICS
- Including Additional Controls from Public Databases Improves the Power of a Genome-Wide Association Study
- (2011) Semanti Mukherjee et al. HUMAN HEREDITY
- Genotype Imputation with Thousands of Genomes
- (2011) Bryan Howie et al. G3-Genes Genomes Genetics
- APOEis not Associated with Alzheimer Disease: a Cautionary tale of Genotype Imputation
- (2010) Gary W. Beecham et al. ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies
- (2010) Ani Manichaikul et al. BIOINFORMATICS
- Optimizing the power of genome-wide association studies by using publicly available reference samples to expand the control group
- (2010) Joanna J. Zhuang et al. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
- MaCH: using sequence and genotype data to estimate haplotypes and unobserved genotypes
- (2010) Yun Li et al. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Using public control genotype data to increase power and decrease cost of case–control genetic association studies
- (2010) Lindsey A. Ho et al. HUMAN GENETICS
- A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing
- (2010) Richard M. Durbin et al. NATURE
- Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies
- (2010) Jonathan Marchini et al. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
- A genome-wide association study of alcohol dependence
- (2010) L. J. Bierut et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Genome-wide association study identifies variants in the ABO locus associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer
- (2009) Laufey Amundadottir et al. NATURE GENETICS
- Designing Genome-Wide Association Studies: Sample Size, Power, Imputation, and the Choice of Genotyping Chip
- (2009) Chris C. A. Spencer et al. PLoS Genetics
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started