4.7 Article

Spatial Patterns of Genome-Wide Expression Profiles Reflect Anatomic and Fiber Connectivity Architecture of Healthy Human Brain

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 35, Issue 8, Pages 4204-4218

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22471

Keywords

gene similarity; brain network; spatial clustering; generalized discriminant analysis; white matter connectivity

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [F32 EB012404-01, P41 RR023953, P41 RR023953-S1, R01 NS075425]
  2. Leon Levy Foundation Fellowship Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unraveling the relationship between molecular signatures in the brain and their functional, architectonic, and anatomic correlates is an important neuroscientific goal. It is still not well understood whether the diversity demonstrated by histological studies in the human brain is reflected in the spatial patterning of whole brain transcriptional profiles. Using genome-wide maps of transcriptional distribution of the human brain by the Allen Brain Institute, we test the hypothesis that gene expression profiles are specific to anatomically described brain regions. In this work, we demonstrate that this is indeed the case by showing that gene similarity clusters appear to respect conventional basal-cortical and caudal-rostral gradients. To fully investigate the causes of this observed spatial clustering, we test a connectionist hypothesis that states that the spatial patterning of gene expression in the brain is simply reflective of the fiber tract connectivity between brain regions. We find that although gene expression and structural connectivity are not determined by each other, they do influence each other with a high statistical significance. This implies that spatial diversity of gene expressions is a result of mainly location-specific features but is influenced by neuronal connectivity, such that like cellular species preferentially connects with like cells. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available