4.7 Article

Automated MRI parcellation of the frontal lobe

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 2009-2026

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22309

Keywords

children; cortex; premotor; automation; segmentation; prefrontal

Funding

  1. Autism Speaks Foundation, National Institutes of Health [R01_NS048527, R01MH078160, R01MH085328]
  2. NeuroBehavioral Research Unit (NRBU) of the General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) [M01 RR00052]
  3. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, the Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center [HD-24061, NIH P30 HD-24061, NIH R01NS056307]
  4. National Center for Research Resources [P41-RR14075]
  5. NCRR BIRN Morphometric Project [BIRN002, U24 RR021382]
  6. National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [R01EB006758]
  7. National Institute on Aging [AG022381]
  8. National Center for Alternative Medicine [RC1 AT005728-01]
  9. National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01 NS052585-01, 1R21NS072652-01]
  10. Shared Instrumentation Grants [1S10RR023401, 1S10RR019, 1S10RR023043]
  11. Ellison Medical Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Examination of associations between specific disorders and physical properties of functionally relevant frontal lobe sub-regions is a fundamental goal in neuropsychiatry. Here, we present and evaluate automated methods of frontal lobe parcellation with the programs FreeSurfer(FS) and TOADS-CRUISE(T-C), based on the manual method described in Ranta et al. [2009]: Psychiatry Res 172:147-154 in which sulcal-gyral landmarks were used to manually delimit functionally relevant regions within the frontal lobe: i.e., primary motor cortex, anterior cingulate, deep white matter, premotor cortex regions (supplementary motor complex, frontal eye field, and lateral premotor cortex) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) regions (medial PFC, dorsolateral PFC, inferior PFC, lateral orbitofrontal cortex [OFC] and medial OFC). Dice's coefficient, a measure of overlap, and percent volume difference were used to measure the reliability between manual and automated delineations for each frontal lobe region. For FS, mean Dice's coefficient for all regions was 0.75 and percent volume difference was 21.2%. For T-C the mean Dice's coefficient was 0.77 and the mean percent volume difference for all regions was 20.2%. These results, along with a high degree of agreement between the two automated methods (mean Dice's coefficient = 0.81, percent volume difference = 12.4%) and a proof-of-principle group difference analysis that highlights the consistency and sensitivity of the automated methods, indicate that the automated methods are valid techniques for parcellation of the frontal lobe into functionally relevant sub-regions. Thus, the methodology has the potential to increase efficiency, statistical power and reproducibility for population analyses of neuropsychiatric disorders with hypothesized frontal lobe contributions. Hum Brain Mapp 35:2009-2026, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available