4.7 Article

Pathological Amygdala Activation During Working Memory Performance: Evidence for a Pathophysiological Trait Marker in Bipolar Affective Disorder

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 115-125

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20849

Keywords

brain imaging; limbic system; psychotic disorders; biological subtype; genetic effect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent evidence suggests that deficits of working memory may be a promising neurocognitive endophenotype of bipolar affective disorder. However, little is known about the neurobiological correlates of these deficits. The aim of this stud), was to determine possible pathophysiological trait markers of bipolar disorder in neural circuits involved in working memory. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 18 euthymic bipolar patients and IS matched healthy volunteers using two circuit-specific experimental tasks established by prior systematic neuroimaging Studies of working memory. Both euthymic bipolar patients and healthy controls showed working memory-related brain activations that were highly consistent with findings from previous comparable neuroimaging studies in healthy subjects. While these patterns of brain activation were completely preserved in the bipolar patients, only the patients exhibited activation of the right amygdala during the articulatory rehearsal task. in the same task, functional activation in right frontal and intraparietal cortex and in the right cerebellum was significantly enhanced in the patients. These findings indicate that the right amygdala is pathologically activated in euthymic bipolar patients during performance of a circuit-specific working memory task (articulatory rehearsal). This pathophysiological abnormality appears to be a trait marker in bipolar disorders that can be observed even in the euthymic state and that seems to be largely independent of task performance and medication. Hum Brain Mapp 31:115-125, 2010. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available