4.4 Article

Differential endocrine responses to infant odors in common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) fathers

Journal

HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages 265-270

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.12.001

Keywords

Olfactory communication; Chemosensory; Infant odors; Testosterone; Androgens; Estrogens; Marmoset; Parenting

Funding

  1. NIH [HD057684]
  2. Wisconsin National Primate Research Center, NIH National Center for Research Resources [RR000167]
  3. University of Wisconsin's Institute of Clinical and Translational Research, NIH National Center for Research Resources [1UL1RR025011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Olfactory cues can exert priming effects on many mammalian species. Paternally experienced marmosets, Callithrix jacchus, exposed to direct isolated olfactory contact with their own infant's scent show rapid decreases in testosterone levels within 20 min, whereas paternally inexperienced males do not. The following study tests whether there is a differential steroid response to exposure of infant scent from dependent infants (own and novel) and independent infants (own and novel). We examined the serum levels of estradiol, estrone, testosterone, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and combined estrogens and androgens in eight male marmosets 20 min after exposure to isolated infant scent. Testosterone and androgen levels combined were significantly lower with exposure to own infant scent than a novel infant scent when the infants were at a dependent age but not at an independent age. Estrogen levels elevated significantly in response to own infant scent when the infants were at a dependent age but not at an independent age. These results suggest that marmoset fathers are more responsive to priming cues from related infants and hormonal responses from fathers are greatest when the infant is at a dependent age. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available