4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

The MEN1 Gene and Pituitary Tumours

Journal

HORMONE RESEARCH
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 131-138

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000192450

Keywords

Angiogenesis; MEN1; Mouse; p27(Kip1); Pituitary tumour; Prolactinoma; Tumour suppressor

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [ZIA DK075035-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sporadic multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is defined as the occurrence of tumours in two of three main endocrine tissue types: parathyroid, pituitary and pancreaticoduodenal. A prolactinoma variant or Burin variant of MEN1 was found to occur in three large kindreds, with more prolactinomas and fewer gastrinomas than typical MEN1. MEN1 tumours differ from common tumours by showing features from the MEN1 gene (e.g. larger pituitary tumours). They also show various expressions of tumour multiplicity; however, pituitary tumour in MEN1 is usually solitary. Diagnosis in MEN1 carriers during childhood is not directed at cancers but at benign morbid tumours. Morbid prolactinoma occurred at the age of 5 years in one MEN1 individual; hence, this is the earliest age at which to recommend tumour surveillance in carriers. The MEN I gene shows biallelic inactivation in 30% of some types of common variety endocrine tumours (e.g. parathyroid adenoma, gastrinoma, insulinoma and bronchial carcinoid), but in only 1-5% of common pituitary tumours. Heterozygous knockout of MEN1 in mice provides a robust model of MEN1 and has been found to support further research on anti-angiogenesis therapy for pituitary tumours. The rarity of MEN1 mutations in some MEN1-like states aids the identification of other mutated genes, such as AIP, HRPT2 and p27(Kip1). We present recent clinical and basic findings about the MEN1 gene, particularly concerning hereditary vs. common variety pituitary tumours. copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available