4.6 Article

The impact of CpG island methylator phenotype and microsatellite instability on tumour budding in colorectal cancer

Journal

HISTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages 777-787

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2012.04273.x

Keywords

CIMP; colorectal cancer; methylation; microsatellite instability; tumour budding

Funding

  1. Krebsliga beider Basel [032007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: In colorectal cancer, tumour budding, a process likened to epithelial mesenchymal transition, is an adverse prognostic factor which is rarely found in tumours with high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Cases with MSI-H or high-level CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP-H) have similar histomorphological features, yet seemingly opposite prognosis. We hypothesized that tumour budding is related to CIMP, thus partially explaining this prognostic difference. Methods and results: MSI, KRAS, BRAF, CIMP and 0(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) were investigated in tissues from 127 colorectal cancer patients. Tumour budding was scored using pan-cytokeratin-stained whole tissue sections within the densest area of buds (x40). Tumour budding was not associated with KRAS, BRAF, MGMT or CIMP, but was correlated inversely with MSI-H (P = 0.0049). Multivariate survival time analysis revealed that tumour budding was independent of all five molecular features and was predicted by MSI status [odds ratio (OR): 4.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-12.1; P = 0.006)], but not CIMP (OR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.3-2.5; P = 0.714). Conclusions: These findings underline that MSI, rather than CIMP, plays a role in conferring a tumour budding phenotype. Budding retains its unfavourable prognostic effect independently of these five molecular features. Continued efforts to standardize the assessment of tumour budding are necessary to integrate this feature into daily diagnostic routine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available