4.6 Article

Expression and clinical significance of the transforming growth factor-β signalling pathway in endometrial cancer

Journal

HISTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages 63-72

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03892.x

Keywords

endometrial cancer; mRNA level; patient prognosis; protein immunoexpression; TGF-beta-Smad signalling pathway

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [T32 CA108456] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To evaluate the components of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta-Smad signalling pathway in human endometrial cancer (EC). Methods and results: TGF-beta 1, TGF-beta receptor type I, TGF-beta receptor type II, Smad2, Smad3, Smad4, Skil and Disabled-2 (DAB2) mRNA levels were determined by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction on EC cell lines and in 70 EC tissues. Immunohistochemistry for Skil and DAB2 antibodies was performed on 362 EC cases. Decreased mRNA levels of all eight components of the TGF-b pathway tested were found in the majority of 70 cases. For DAB2, the mRNA level was correlated with protein expression level (P = 0.04). The Skil mRNA level was associated with tumour stage (P = 0.03), and the Smad2/3/4 mRNA level with tumour grade (P = 0.03, P = 0.02, and P = 0.00, respectively). The Smad4 mRNA level was also associated with tumour size (P = 0.05), subtype (P = 0.04), and disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.05). The TGF-beta 1 mRNA level was associated with DFS (P = 0.04). Finally, tumours with positive Skil protein expression had a shorter recurrence time, whereas, those with positive DAB2 protein expression had a longer recurrence time. Conclusions: Down-regulation of the TGF-beta-Smad signalling pathway might be responsible for the pathogenesis of human EC, and some of its components appeared to be prognostic factors. Exploration of future therapy targeting the TGF-beta-Smad pathway is warranted in EC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available