4.6 Article

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-23 and fetuin-A in calcified carotid atheroma

Journal

HISTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages 775-788

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03547.x

Keywords

atherosclerosis; carotid atheroma; fetuin-A; fibroblast growth factor-23; intimal arterial calcification

Funding

  1. Medical Faculty, University of Rostock [88 90 47]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Human atheroma calcification occurs secondary to repetitive injury/remodelling of the vessel wall and might be initiated by adherence of mineral-loaded fetuin-A whether or not professional matrix mineralizing cells are present. The aim was to investigate the contribution of fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-23 to ectopic mineralization. Methods and results: Serial sections of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human carotid atheroma (n = 54) were investigated with respect to (i) size and distribution of calcific deposits, (ii) indicators of chondrogenic/osteogenic transformation, and (iii) expression of fetuin-A and FGF-23. All specimens were calcified and SOX-9, collagen type II, cathepsin-K, fetuin-A and FGF-23 expression was seen in 46, 53, 53, 54 and 48 specimens, respectively. The intracellular detection of FGF-23 (45/48) indicates local synthesis. Whereas fetuin-A expression was seen also within areas of vascular smooth muscle actin-positive cells adjacent to calcific deposits, FGF-23 expression was apparently restricted to the mineralization-prone areas. Both local expression and FGF-23 serum concentrations were significantly associated with the degree of atheroma calcification. Conclusions: Besides the induction of bone islets and subsequent mineral deposition, severe remodelling of the vessel wall is sufficient to create a mineralizable fetuin-A-attracting microenvironment. FGF-23 might contribute to the formation of proper mineral, i.e. control local phosphate concentration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available