4.4 Article

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy-10-year experience at a teaching hospital

Journal

LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
Volume 400, Issue 3, Pages 341-347

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-015-1287-x

Keywords

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy; Complications; Pheochromocytoma; Conn syndrome; Cushing syndrome

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Minimally invasive adrenalectomy has been adopted as the treatment of choice for benign adrenal tumors. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of laparoscopic adrenalectomies performed over a 10-year period at a teaching hospital. All laparoscopic adrenalectomies carried out between 1 April 2000 and 31 March 2010 were evaluated with respect to perioperative management, complications, conversion rate, learning curve, tumor size, and surgically relevant characteristics of different adrenal pathologies. Over a period of 10 years, 215 laparoscopic lateral transabdominal adrenalectomies were carried out for Conn's syndrome (n = 90), Cushing's syndrome (n = 72), pheochromocytoma (n = 30), metastatic disease (n = 8), incidentalomas (n = 10), and other rare adrenal pathologies (n = 5). Morbidity, mortality, and conversion rate were 7.0, 0.9, and 4.2 %, respectively. Patients with Cushing's disease and bilateral adrenalectomy showed a higher complication rate. In retrospect, the indication for a laparoscopic approach was at least questionable in five cases. During these 10 years, four surgeons unfamiliar with the technique received intensive training to a defined plan. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy represents a safe operating technique associated with few complications and a low conversion rate. Patients with severe Cushing's disease are prone to complications and require intensive monitoring postoperatively. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is associated with a learning curve, and particular emphasis should be given to surgical training.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available