4.5 Article

First-generation linkage map for the common frog Rana temporaria reveals sex-linkage group

Journal

HEREDITY
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages 530-536

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2011.39

Keywords

amphibian; linkage map; microsatellite; Rana temporaria; sex determination; quantitative trait loci

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Academy of Finland
  3. Ministry of Education, Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The common frog (Rana temporaria) has become a model species in the fields of ecology and evolutionary biology. However, lack of genomic resources has been limiting utility of this species for detailed evolutionary genetic studies. Using a set of 107 informative microsatellite markers genotyped in a large full-sib family (800 F1 offspring), we created the first linkage map for this species. This partial map-distributed over 15 linkage groups-has a total length of 1698.8 cM. In line with the fact that males are the heterogametic sex in this species and a reduction of recombination is expected, we observed a lower recombination rate in the males (map length: 1371.5 cM) as compared with females (2089.8 cM). Furthermore, three loci previously documented to be sex-linked (that is, carrying male-specific alleles) in adults from the wild mapped to the same linkage group. The linkage map described in this study is one of the densest ones available for amphibians. The discovery of a sex linkage group in Rana temporaria, as well as other regions with strongly reduced male recombination rates, should help to uncover the genetic underpinnings of the sex-determination system in this species. As the number of linkage groups found (n = 15) is quite close to the actual number of chromosomes (n = 13), the map should provide a useful resource for further evolutionary, ecological and conservation genetic work in this and other closely related species. Heredity (2011) 107, 530-536; doi:10.1038/hdy.2011.39; published online 18 May 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available