4.5 Article

Clinical usefulness of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for patients with primary liver cancer with special reference to rare histological types, hepatocellular carcinoma with sarcomatous change and combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma

Journal

HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 481-487

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2012.01107.x

Keywords

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma; hepatocellular carcinoma; sarcomatous hepatocellular carcinoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the diagnosis and staging of primary liver cancer has been demonstrated in several reports. However, no preoperative evaluations of sarcomatous hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) with FDG-PET have been reported so far. Methods Fifty-three HCC patients and three cHCC-CC patients who received liver resection or living-donor liver transplantation were enrolled in this study. All 56 patients had undergone preoperative FDG-PET, and a total of 67 HCC and three cHCC-CC were analyzed histologically. The relationship between clinicopathological features and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of tumors were evaluated. Results The detection rate of HCC by FDG-PET was 43.3 %, and the sensitivity of FDG-PET for the detection of HCC was significantly associated with tumor differentiation, tumor size and microvascular invasion. All three cHCC-CC were detected by FDG-PET. The SUVmax values of the three sarcomatous HCC (SUVmax 14.1, 18.6 and 25.0) and the three cHCC-CC (SUVmax 9.9, 12.0 and 13.0) were higher than that of the poorly differentiated HCC (mean SUVmax 5.7 +/- 2.3). Conclusion SUVmax may be a useful diagnostic tool for the preoperative evaluation of the aggressiveness of primary liver cancers such as sarcomatous HCC and cHCC-CC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available