4.5 Article

Significance of chymase-dependent angiotensin II formation in the progression of human liver fibrosis

Journal

HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 501-510

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00271.x

Keywords

angiotensin II; angiotensin-converting enzyme; chymase; cirrhosis; fibrosis; mast cells

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Angiotensin II may contribute to liver fibrogenesis. In addition to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), chymase, which is expressed by mast cells, is also known to be an angiotensin II-forming enzyme. However, it is unclear which of these two angiotensin II-forming enzymes plays a more important role in liver cirrhosis progression. In the present study, the role of angiotensin II-forming enzymes in the progression of liver cirrhosis was clarified. Methods: A total of 77 patients (16 in F0 stage, 10 in F1 stage, 22 in F2 stage, 12 in F3 stage, and 17 in F4 stage) were classified according to the new Inuyama classification into a non-cirrhosis (F0) group, an early cirrhosis (F1 + F2) group, and a chronic cirrhosis (F3 + F4) group. Results: Both chymase and total angiotensin II-forming activities were significantly higher in chronic cirrhosis patients than in the other two groups. However, there was nodifference among the three groups in ACE activity. On immunohistology, the number of chymase- and angiotensin II-positive cells was significantly higher in the chronic cirrhosis group than in the non-cirrhosis and early cirrhosis groups. There were significant correlations between the number of chymase-positive cells and the number of angiotensin II-positive cells, between the number of chymase-positive cells and the degree of fibrosis, and between the number of angiotensin II-positive cells and the degree of fibrosis. Conclusion: These results suggest that chymase-dependent angiotensin II formation may play an important role in hepatic fibrosis of patients with cirrhosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available