4.3 Article

Laparoscopic liver resection for benign and malignant liver tumors

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1499-3872(11)60005-2

Keywords

hepatectomy; liver neoplasm; liver surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection is one of the most complex procedures in hepatobiliary surgery. In the last two decades, laparoscopic liver surgery has emerged as an option at major academic institutions. The purpose of this study is to describe the initial experience of minimally invasive liver resections at a non-academic institution. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resections between June 2006 and December 2009 at our center. Indications, technical aspects, and outcomes of these patients are described. RESULTS: Laparoscopic liver resection was attempted in 28 patients. Of these, 27 patients underwent laparoscopic liver resection (22 total laparoscopic and 5 hand assisted) and one needed conversion to open surgery. Twenty patients had a benign lesion and 8 had malignant lesions. Three patients had multiple lesions in different segments requiring separate resections. The lesions were located in segments II-III (n=18), IV (n=3), V-VI (n=9), and VII (n=1). Tumor size ranged from 1.5 cm to 8.5 cm. The surgical procedures included left lateral sectionectomy (n=17), left hepatectomy (n=2), sectionectomy (n=8), and local resections (n=4). Median operative time was 110 minutes (range 55-210 minutes), and the median length of hospital stay was 2.5 days (range 1-7 days). There was no perioperative mortality. One patient developed hernia at the site of tumor extraction requiring repair at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic liver resections can be safely performed in selected patients with benign and malignant liver tumors. With increasing experience, laparoscopic liver resections are likely to become a favorable alternative to open resection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available