4.0 Article

Safety profiles of total dose infusion of low-molecular-weight iron dextran and high-dose iron sucrose in renal patients

Journal

HEMODIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 374-378

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2011.00550.x

Keywords

Iron sucrose; low-molecular-weight iron dextran; renal patients; total dose infusion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Iron sucrose and low-molecular-weight iron dextran (LMW-ID), two commonly used iron solutions, have been compared in terms of allergic adverse event profiles to date. However, the safety of total dose infusion of LMW-ID has been investigated by only one study in chronic kidney disease (CKD) (not dialysis) patients. Thus, we aimed to compare adverse event profiles of total and high-dose LMW-ID and iron sucrose infusions in a heterogenous renal patient group comprising CKD, hemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis. In this retrospective chart review study, we included 110 predialysis CKD, 101 peritoneal dialysis, and 118 hemodialysis patients. We included a total of 329 patients who were administered parenteral iron sucrose or LMW-ID between September 2006 and April 2010. Adverse events were determined both by medical and nursing follow-up notes. Laboratory data and clinical characteristics were collected from patient charts. Adverse event rates were compared between iron sucrose and LMW-ID infusions. In a total of 329 patients, 530 infusions (3470 ampules) were administered. We detected adverse reaction in only 1 patient. This adverse reaction, which manifested as generalized pruritus, occurred in a patient who received 500 mg of iron sucrose infusion. There were neither anaphylactic reactions nor deaths associated with infusion of either preparation. We did not observe any other adverse event related to administration of 500 and 1000 mg of iron sucrose at single infusion. The results of this study showed comparable safety of total dose LMW-ID and high-dose iron sucrose in a heterogenous group of renal patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available