4.4 Article

Disparities in Perinatal Quality Outcomes for Very Low Birth Weight Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care

Journal

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 374-397

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12225

Keywords

Health disparities; nurse staffing; nurse practice environment; quality standards; VLBW infants

Funding

  1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Interdisciplinary Nursing Quality Research Initiative grant
  2. National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health [R01NR010357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo determine if hospital-level disparities in very low birth weight (VLBW) infant outcomes are explained by poorer hospital nursing characteristics. Data SourcesNurse survey and VLBW infant registry data. Study DesignRetrospective study of 8,252 VLBW infants in 98 Vermont Oxford Network hospital neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) nationally. NICUs were classified into three groups based on their percent of infants of black race. Two nurse-sensitive perinatal quality standards were studied: nosocomial infection and breast milk. Data CollectionPrimary nurse survey (N=5,773, 77 percent response rate). Principal FindingsVLBW infants born in high-black concentration hospitals had higher rates of infection and discharge without breast milk than VLBW infants born in low-black concentration hospitals. Nurse understaffing was higher and practice environments were worse in high-black as compared to low-black hospitals. NICU nursing features accounted for one-third to one-half of the hospital-level health disparities. ConclusionsPoorer nursing characteristics contribute to disparities in VLBW infant outcomes in two nurse-sensitive perinatal quality standards. Improvements in nursing have potential to improve the quality of care for seven out of ten black VLBW infants who are born in high-black hospitals in this country.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available