4.4 Article

Preventive HIV Vaccine Acceptability and Behavioral Risk Compensation among a Random Sample of High-Risk Adults in Los Angeles (LA VOICES)

Journal

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 2167-2179

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01039.x

Keywords

HIV; AIDS; HIV vaccine; conjoint analysis; risk compensation; venue-based probability sampling

Funding

  1. NIMH [R01MH69087]
  2. Canada Research Chairs Program
  3. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  4. UCLA/DREW Project EXPORT (NCMHD) [P20MD000148/P20MD000182]
  5. UCLA Center for Health Improvement of Minority Elderly/Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research (NIA) [P30AG021684]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To assess HIV vaccine acceptability among high-risk adults in Los Angeles. Study Setting Sexually transmitted disease clinics, needle/syringe exchange programs, Latino community health/HIV prevention programs. Study Design Cross-sectional survey using conjoint analysis. Participants were randomly selected using three-stage probability sampling. Data Collection Sixty-minute structured interviews. Participants rated acceptability of eight hypothetical vaccines, each with seven dichotomous attributes, and reported post-vaccination risk behavior intentions. Principal Findings Participants (n=1164; 55.7 percent male, 82.4 percent ethnic minority, mean age=37.4 years) rated HIV vaccine acceptability from 28.4 to 88.6; mean=54.5 (SD=18.8; 100-point scale). Efficacy had the greatest impact on acceptability, followed by side effects and out-of-pocket cost. Ten percent would decrease condom use after vaccination. Conclusions Findings support development of social marketing interventions to increase acceptability of partial efficacy vaccines, behavioral interventions to mitigate risk compensation, and targeted cost subsidies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available