4.4 Article

Dosage Patterns in Methadone Treatment: Results from a National Survey, 1988-2005

Journal

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages 2143-2163

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00870.x

Keywords

Methadone maintenance; substance abuse treatment; opiate; managed care

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD [5-R01-DA-3272-18]
  2. Chicago Center of Excellence in Health Promotion Economics, Chicago, IL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To examine the extent to which U.S. methadone maintenance facilities meet established standards for minimum dosages, 1988-2005. Data were collected from a nationally representative sample of outpatient treatment facilities in 1988 (n=172), 1990 (n=140), 1995 (n=116), 2000 (n=150), and 2005 (n=146). Random-effects multiple regression analysis was used to examine unit characteristics associated with below recommended doses. Data regarding the proportion of patients who received maintenance dosages of < 40, 60, and 80 mg/day were collected from unit directors and clinical supervisors. Forty-four percent of patients receive doses of at least 80 mg/day-the threshold identified as recommended practice in recent work. Thirty-four percent of patients receive doses below 60 mg/day, while 17 percent receive doses below 40 mg/day. Units that serve a high proportion of African American or Latino clients were more likely to report low-dose care. Units managed by individuals who strongly favor abstinence models (e.g., Narcotics Anonymous) were more likely to provide low-dose care. One-third of methadone facilities provide doses below recommended levels. Managerial attitudes about abstinence and their relationship to low doses underscore the contested role of methadone in treatment of opiate disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available