4.5 Article

Randomized controlled trial of an intervention to prevent adherence failure among HIV-Infected patients initiating Antiretroviral therapy

Journal

HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 159-169

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.2.159

Keywords

HIV; AIDS; adherence; compliance; intervention

Funding

  1. PHS HHS [U64/CCU414932] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Compare the efficacy of a multicomponent social support intervention to standard-of-care counseling on medication adherence among HIV-infected patients initiating antiretroviral therapy. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Generalized estimating equations tested for differences in the percentage of participants achieving 90% adherence. Main Outcome Measures: Pill-taking, electronically monitored over 6 consecutive months; plasma viral load (VL), assessed at 3 and 6 months following initiation of therapy. Results: Of 226 participants who were randomized and began the trial, 87 (38%) were lost to the study by 6 months. The proportion of adherent participants declined steadily over time, with no time by group interaction. Sustained adherence was associated with increased odds of achieving an undetectable VL (OR = 1.78; 95% Cl = 1.01, 3.13). In intention-to-treat analyses, a larger proportion of the intervention group than the control group was adherent (40.15% vs. 27.59%, p =.02) and achieved an undetectable VL (p=.04). However, the majority of participants who remained on study experienced some reduction in (>= 1-log drop or undetectable), regardless of experimental condition. Conclusion: The multicomponent social support intervention significantly improved medication adherence over standard-of-care counseling; evidence for improved virologic outcomes was inconsistent. Early disconfinuation of care and treatment may be a greater threat to the health of HIV patients than imperfect medication-taking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available